ArticleBMC public health2026
The impact of carbon emissions trading scheme on residents' medical expenses: a test based on multi-period difference-in-differences method.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Utilizing data from the China Family Panel Studies (CFPS) from 2010 to 2022, this study employs a multi-period difference-in-differences approach to estimate the impact of Carbon Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) on residents’ medical expenses. The results demonstrate that it has significantly reduced residents’ total medical expenses and out-of-pocket expenses. Regressions using different samples show that the ETS reduces residents’ average total medical expenses by 442 RMB and average out-of-pocket medical expenses by 1207 RMB. A finding that remains robust across a series of tests, including placebo checks. Mechanism analyses indicate that the reduction is primarily driven by lower carbon emissions and environmental improvements, which contribute to decreasing the frequency of hospitalizations among residents, thereby reducing both overall and out-of-pocket medical expenses. Heterogeneity analysis reveals that the negative effect of the ETS on total medical expenses is attenuated among older individuals, those who are married, those with chronic diseases, and those in self-rated poor health. However, marital status and chronic conditions do not moderate the policy’s effect on out-of-pocket expenses. The findings of this paper are of great significance in promoting the deep integration of Carbon Peaking and Carbon Neutrality Goals and the Healthy China initiative.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.