ArticleBMC cancer2026
An unexpected paradox: examining the relationship between solid fuel heating and reduced cancer risk in CHARLS.
Article in BMC cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimWhile solid fuel use is a known health concern, its specific link to cancer incidence via heating in China’s elderly remains unclear. This study investigated this association using data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS).
methodsThe research used data from CHARLS. The primary exposure variable was the use of solid fuels for heating. The primary outcome was incident cancer. All statistical analyses were performed utilizing SPSS software (version 25.0) and R software (version 4.4.4).
resultsWe analyzed 6,753 participants without baseline cancer. The primary exposure was solid fuel use for heating, and the outcome was incident cancer. Logistic regression models were used, adjusting for confounders. Over a nine-year follow-up, 299 (4.43%) participants developed cancer. Contrary to the initial hypothesis, solid fuel use for heating was statistically associated with a lower cancer risk (adjusted OR = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.61–0.98). Mediation analysis indicated depressive symptoms, LDL-C, and total cholesterol masked portions of this effect. Subgroup analyses showed the association was more pronounced in specific demographics.
conclusionThis study reveals a paradoxical statistical link between solid fuel heating and reduced cancer risk. We strongly caution against interpreting this as a biological causal effect. Instead, methodological factors and sociodemographic biases—such as healthcare access, socioeconomic status, and detection bias—are likely critical contributors. These findings highlight the importance of accounting for structural biases in health research to avoid misleading conclusions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.