ArticleBMC oral health2026
Model surgery-guided interpositional arthroplasty with condylar prosthesis replacement for temporomandibular joint ankylosis: a preliminary single-center case series study.
Article in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo explore the feasibility of model surgery-guided interpositional arthroplasty combined with condylar prosthesis as a complementary surgical option for temporomandibular joint ankylosis (TMJA), this study preliminarily evaluated its clinical outcomes.
methodsA retrospective case series of four consecutive TMJA patients (2020–2022). Both subjective and objective outcomes were assessed by comparing preoperative and postoperative measurements, including maximal interincisal opening (MIO), visual analog scale (VAS) scores for pain, diet, jaw function, and quality of life (QoL). Computed tomography was used to evaluate the status of the condylar prosthesis and the recontoured glenoid fossa, with documentation of any complications during the follow-up period.
resultsThe mean follow-up duration was 4 years and 4 months, (minimum 3 years and 4 months). At the final follow-up, the mean MIO was increased to 35.0 mm from a preoperative mean of 7.25 mm. Reductions were observed in VAS scores for pain, diet, and jaw function, while QoL scores improved from “poor” to “excellent.” Imaging confirmed stable and well-centered positioning of all prostheses, with no evidence of screw loosening, prosthesis displacement/fracture, or heterotopic bone formation. Complications included one case of occasional paresthesia, which resolved with conservative management.
conclusionIn this small preliminary case series, the technique improved mouth opening, symptoms, and quality of life over 3 years, with no re-ankylosis. While short-term results are encouraging, historical concerns about long-term complications warrant caution. Larger, controlled studies with extended follow-up are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.