ArticleBMC cancer2026
Genomic landscape of cholangiocarcinoma in India: ethnic variants and implications for targeted therapy.
Article in BMC cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a molecularly heterogeneous malignancy of the biliary tract with rising global incidence and distinct geographic variations in oncogenic drivers. Despite India’s significant cancer burden, genomic data on CCA in Indian patients remain sparse, limiting the development of targeted therapies.
methodsThis retrospective, multi-institutional study analyzed molecular data from 220 patients with cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), including 147 cases of cholangiocarcinoma not otherwise specified (CCA-unclassified), 63 intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas (ICA), and 10 distal extrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas (dCCA). Samples were evaluated across three Indian institutions using multiple validated next-generation sequencing (NGS) platforms. The resulting genomic profiles were subsequently compared with international datasets available through cBioPortal. To minimize platform bias, mutation frequency comparisons were restricted to 42 DNA and 13 RNA genes present across all platforms. Statistical significance was assessed using Fisher’s exact test with false discovery rate (FDR) correction for multiple testing.
resultsAmong 220 CCA cases, 147 (66.8%) were anatomically unclassified, 63 (28.6%) intrahepatic (ICA), and 10 (4.5%) distal extrahepatic (dCCA), with pronounced male predominance overall (M: F 1.7:1) and in ICA cases (2.2:1). In the unclassified cohort, the most frequent mutations were TP53 (35.6%), KRAS (19.4%), IDH1(10.2% ) and PIK3CA (9.4%). Compared to international cBioPortal data, the Indian cohort showed significantly elevated TP53 (35.8% vs. 24.2%; P = 0.0001), KRAS (19.4% vs. 13.0%; P = 0.009), and PIK3CA (9.4% vs. 4.1%; P = 0.001) mutations, but lower BAP1 frequencies (5.0% vs. 13.2%; P = 0.007). IDH1 mutations were similar in both cohorts (10.2% vs. 11.1%; p = 0.74). Anatomically defined cases (N = 73) showed concordant patterns. Notably, a distinctive spectrum of non-fusion FGFR2 alterations (8 alterations: 3 pathogenic mutations, 3 copy number amplifications, 1 VUS) was identified, distinct from the global pattern of FGFR2 fusions. Tumor mutation burden was predominantly low (14/15 cases), and microsatellite instability-high was rare (1/29, 3.4%).
interpretationThis study reveals region-specific genomic alterations in Indian CCA, including elevated TP53/KRAS mutations and a distinctive non-fusion FGFR2 alteration pattern, distinct from global CCA registries. These ethnicity-stratified findings underscore the importance of population-specific genomic profiling for precision oncology and warrant prospective studies correlating these alterations with treatment response in Indian patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.