ReviewCritical care (London, England)2026
The contribution of mechanical ventilation to critical illness-associated diaphragm dysfunction: a critical appraisal.
Review in Critical care (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The contribution of mechanical ventilation to critical illness-associated diaphragm dysfunction: longitudinal trajectories alone do not establish causal primacy.Critical care (London, England) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although diaphragm dysfunction is increasingly recognized as a major contributor to morbidity and mortality in the intensive care unit, the physiological mechanisms leading to its development in mechanically ventilated patients are incompletely understood. Mechanical ventilation is often recognized as the main cause of the problem, delineating a paradigm known as ventilator-induced diaphragm dysfunction (VIDD). Yet, evidence on this causal relationship in ventilated critically ill patients is scarce, with direct experimental data mostly coming from animal models or brain-dead organ donors. In this narrative review, we provide a critical appraisal on the contribution of mechanical ventilation to diaphragm dysfunction and an integration with other major mechanisms involved in its development and trajectory over time. Examining this complex interplay is important, as it may support clinicians in adhering to expert consensus on diaphragm protective mechanical ventilation. First, the evidence for mechanisms potentially caused by mechanical ventilation, such as disuse atrophy, under- and over-assistance, PEEP and asynchronies is analyzed. Secondly, important contributors not directly explained by ventilator support, such as inflammation and sepsis, muscle hibernation and impaired calcium sensitivity of force are addressed. Finally, a summary of this complex scenario is provided together with clinical and research-oriented key messages, highlighting the reasons for which the term critical illness-associated diaphragm dysfunction may be more appropriate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.