ArticleBMC cardiovascular disorders2026
Machine learning predicts ICU mortality in cardiogenic shock: interpreting SOFA, lactate, and pH thresholds.
Article in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCardiogenic shock (CS) is a critical condition characterized by high mortality and clinical heterogeneity, creating a pressing need for advanced prognostic tools beyond traditional methods.
methodsWe analyzed 1827 CS patients from the MIMIC-IV database. Key predictive features were identified using a dual strategy combining the Boruta algorithm and LASSO regression. Eight machine learning models were developed and evaluated for discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility.
resultsAmong the included patients, 27.1% died during their ICU stay. The Logistic Regression model achieved the best overall performance among the evaluated algorithms (AUC 0.775 [95% CI: 0.722–0.821], Accuracy 0.712, Precision 0.787, F1-score 0.762) and demonstrated good calibration with a Brier score of 0.158. The classification threshold was optimized using Youden’s Index. Compared to complex ensemble models, Logistic Regression provided a robust and highly interpretable solution without requiring extensive hyperparameter tuning. Crucially, SHAP analysis provided model interpretability, identifying SOFA score, lactate, and pH as the most influential predictors. The model further quantified clinical risk gradients: mortality risk increased markedly when passing critical transition zones, specifically corresponding to SOFA scores of 8–10, lactate levels of 2.5–3.0 mmol/L, and deviations from a physiological pH range of 7.35–7.40.
conclusionThis study developed an interpretable machine learning model that predicts ICU mortality in CS patients with promising internal performance. By providing exploratory, cohort-specific risk ranges, the model identifies potentially relevant predictors that offer hypothesis-generating insights, which require further external validation before clinical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.