Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42010351›Full record

ReviewNature protocols2026

Considerations for the design of impactful citizen-science projects in microbiome research.

Sarah Ahannach, Sandra Condori-Catachura, Jelle Dillen, Caroline Dricot, Thies Gehrmann, Stijn Wittouck, Josiane Marie Kenfack, Wannes Van Beeck, Ilke De Boeck, Tom Eilers and 9 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Sarah AhannachLaboratory of Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, Department of Bioscience Engineering, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8274-5342
Sandra Condori-CatachuraLaboratory of Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, Department of Bioscience Engineering, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9494-6336
Jelle DillenLaboratory of Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, Department of Bioscience Engineering, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4160-7645
Caroline DricotLaboratory of Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, Department of Bioscience Engineering, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Thies GehrmannLaboratory of Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, Department of Bioscience Engineering, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Stijn WittouckLaboratory of Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, Department of Bioscience Engineering, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3913-5677
Josiane Marie KenfackLaboratory of Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, Department of Bioscience Engineering, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Wannes Van BeeckLaboratory of Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, Department of Bioscience Engineering, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Ilke De BoeckLaboratory of Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, Department of Bioscience Engineering, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Tom EilersLaboratory of Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, Department of Bioscience Engineering, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7509-2902
Monica TicllaLaboratory of Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, Department of Bioscience Engineering, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Agustina Santullo LatorreLaboratory of Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, Department of Bioscience Engineering, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-5576-6934
Wenke SmetsLaboratory of Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, Department of Bioscience Engineering, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5611-6094
Jari TemmermansLaboratory of Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, Department of Bioscience Engineering, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Enya Arconada NuinLaboratory of Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, Department of Bioscience Engineering, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0053-4075
Sandra Van PuyveldeLaboratory of Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, Department of Bioscience Engineering, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Irina SpacovaLaboratory of Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, Department of Bioscience Engineering, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Veronique VerhoevenU-MaMi Centre of Excellence, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3708-6501
Sarah LebeerLaboratory of Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, Department of Bioscience Engineering, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium. sarah.lebeer@uantwerpen.be.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Citizen science offers a transformative approach to microbiome research. It allows the collection of rich, context-specific data from diverse sources, such as varying human populations and environments. Here, we describe guidelines that cover the design and implementation of community-engaged citizen-science projects focused on microbiome research. We outline essential research steps, beginning with defining the objectives and forming a transdisciplinary team, and continuing with community interaction, standardized self-sampling protocols, strategies for data processing, analysis and communication of results to community members and policymakers, as well as the implementation of robust data management practices that uphold participant privacy and data sovereignty. The guidelines highlight culturally-sensitive outreach strategies and capacity building in research teams and communities, emphasizing ethical considerations and tailored recruitment strategies. Community engagement may help reduce sampling bias but does not automatically ensure participant diversity: intentional inclusion strategies are essential. They cover culturally sensitive outreach, ethical considerations and tailored recruitment approaches that support inclusive participation and meaningful collaboration. These recommendations draw inspiration from a range of health and environment-related citizen-science projects in Belgium, Peru and Cameroon, and collaborative projects across the world. Specific examples highlight the importance of adapting methodologies to diverse cultural contexts and logistical constraints. While wet-laboratory sample processing and downstream analyses are detailed elsewhere, this Perspective focuses on the unique considerations and best practices needed for designing impactful cocreative citizen-science projects that combine scientific discovery with community, environmental health and well-being. It can serve as a blueprint for future citizen-science initiatives that aim to expand access to microbiome research, foster global collaboration and promote long-term research equity and environmental sustainability.

Indexed as

Citizen ScienceMicrobiotaResearch DesignHumans

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.