ArticleHealth policy and planning2026
Identifying the 'real cause of death': the complexities of maternal death reviews in Tanzania.
Article in Health policy and planning, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Identifying the causes of maternal deaths and contributing factors is essential for improving care. In 2015, Tanzania began implementing the maternal and perinatal death surveillance and response (MPDSR) system, including facility-based maternal death reviews. While most MPDSR studies highlight implementation and technical barriers, less is known about how systemic and institutional dynamics influence these reviews. This study examined stakeholders' experiences and perceptions of MPDSR in Tanzania, focusing on how clinical causes of death and contributing factors were identified. The study is based on 5 months of ethnographic fieldwork conducted in a Tanzanian region in 2023-2024. It included 33 days of participatory observation of obstetric care, attending nine facility-based maternal death review meetings and conducting 20 in-depth interviews with health workers and administrative staff. Viewing MPDSR as a travelling model and drawing upon the concept of situated knowledge, we examined how institutional and professional factors influenced these reviews. Reviews were routinized and integrated into the regional health system, offering opportunities for teaching and defining standards of practice. However, participants disagreed on whether the reviews promoted quality improvement or focused on individual fault-finding, on how responsibility should be attributed, and whether reviews could accurately establish the causes of deaths. The facility-based death reviews were influenced by institutional and epistemic hierarchies, with responsibility often placed on individuals at the lowest health system level. While MPDSR aims to promote blame-free learning and quality improvement, the process narrowed attention to individual error, obscured systemic constraints, and hindered understanding of the 'real cause' of maternal deaths. To capture contextual complexity without adding reporting burden, we recommend expanding the free-text narrative fields in the official MPDSR maternal death report forms and increasing frontline representation in district- and regional reviews to strengthen links between facility and higher-level reviews.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.