ArticleScientific data2026
A seven-year metagenomic genome catalogue of mangrove and mudflat sediments from the Futian Reserve, China.
Article in Scientific data, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A seven-year metagenomic genome catalogue of mangrove and mudflat sediments from the Futian Reserve, China.Scientific data · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mangrove wetlands are ecologically and biogeochemically important "blue-carbon" ecosystems, yet long-term genomic resources for their microbial communities remain scarce. Here we present a seven-year (2017-2023) metagenomic dataset from the Futian Mangrove National Nature Reserve, China, comprising 65 sediment samples collected from paired habitats (mangrove forest and adjacent mudflat) across multiple depths. Sequencing produced ~5.3 Tbp of data, from which 6,922 metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) were reconstructed and dereplicated into 3,404 representative genomes (336 Archaea and 3,068 Bacteria). Quality control ensured that all genomes achieved medium- or high-quality standards, with assembly statistics and read recruitment rates supporting robustness and representativeness. Taxonomic annotation revealed broad phylogenetic diversity spanning 13 archaeal and 69 bacterial phyla, with many lineages lacking formal nomenclature and representing potential novel taxa. All raw sequences, genome assemblies, and detailed metadata have been deposited in public repositories, providing a standardized, time-resolved resource for comparative genomics, microbial ecology, and ecosystem restoration studies in coastal wetlands.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.