ReviewCell death & disease2026
Methodological guidelines for P2X receptor assays and data interpretation.
Review in Cell death & disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- ATP Release and Purinergic Signaling Potentiate β-Adrenergic Effects on Brown Adipocytes.Acta physiologica (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- ATP is not always pro-inflammatory: rethinking purinergic signalling in cancer and autoimmunity.Purinergic signalling · 2026Review
- ATP-P2X3 Signaling as a Shared Neural Sensitization Pathway in Endometriosis and Irritable Bowel Syndrome: Mechanisms and Therapeutic Implications.Biomedicines · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
29 authors.
Funding
Abstract
P2X receptors (P2XR) are a family of seven cation channels gated by extracellular ATP (eATP). Activation of P2XRs results in diverse cellular responses, including cell signalling, proliferation, differentiation, and death-all critically important in multiple physiological and pathophysiological states. These receptors, therefore, represent therapeutic targets of considerable interest. However, P2XRs, while structurally related, exhibit highly divergent and context-dependent functions. Their spatiotemporal and functional complexity is evident by overlapping expression across multiple cell types that can shift dynamically during physiological processes or disease progression. Furthermore, P2XRs can assemble as homo- or hetero-trimers, with distinct functional properties. These factors complicate definitive identification of a given P2XR responsible for a specific pathophysiological effect. Receptor activity in vivo is transient because of receptor-specific mechanisms and follows eATP breakdown by ectonucleotidases. Any correlation of ATP release with receptor engagement, as assessed in vitro, often does not correspond with the in vivo dynamics. Translation from animal models to humans is complicated by the species-specific pharmacology of some P2XRs, confounded by many animal models in use not fully replicating human P2XR function and regulation in pathology. Furthermore, there are no clinical biomarkers to distinguish incomplete receptor blockade from lack of therapeutic effect. Thus, translation has been very limited. To identify and validate specific P2XR functionalities, future experimental designs should use approaches and assays that can reliably assess receptor involvement, while reducing methodologically flawed findings. We propose guidelines developed in consultation with the purinergic community for consistent and reliable research practices in P2XR studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.