ArticleScientific reports2026
Semantic processing and individual suggestibility modulate motor preparation and perceived distance for looming sounds entering the peripersonal space.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Our brain maps the space immediately surrounding the body, the peripersonal space (PPS), to sharpen sensory-motor coordination whenever an object enters it. Within PPS, past research demonstrated how several factors influence motor readiness: from stimulus characteristics, such as body-object distance and stimulus semantics, to personality traits like anxiety. However, most paradigms infer PPS boundaries using tactile and visual stimuli, with auditory cues often playing an ancillary role, rather than directly measuring response modulation to stimuli entering the PPS. Here, we measured anticipatory postural adjustments, as direct physiological indices of motor planning, to examine whether semantic content and individual suggestibility modulate responses to looming sounds stopping within PPS. Thirty-three adults heard affective semantic sounds (positive - applause, negative - dentist drill) or neutral non-semantic (pink noise) sounds halting at five within-PPS distances while we recorded muscle activation timing, distance estimates, affective ratings, and sensory suggestibility. Motor responses were faster as sounds stopped nearer the body but systematically delayed and less precise for semantic sounds compared to non-semantic sounds, with higher suggestibility predicting longer and more variable latencies, particularly for non-semantic sounds. These findings demonstrate that semantic evaluation imposes measurable processing costs that systematically delay motor preparation and increase perceived distance. Individual suggestibility produces freeze-like response patterns that amplify motor uncertainty, specifically when semantic context is absent, revealing distinct cognitive and trait-based mechanisms that jointly regulate defensive behaviour within PPS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.