Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42010222›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2026

Transfer of veterinary parasiticides from the fur lining bird's nest to eggs and chicks.

Cannelle Tassin-de-Montaigu, Gaetan Glauser, Sylvie Guinchard, Dave Goulson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Cannelle Tassin-de-MontaiguUniversity of Sussex School of Life Sciences, Brighton, UK. ct430@sussex.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5228-6651
Gaetan GlauserFaculte Des Sciences, Universite de Neuchatel, Neuchatel, Switzerland.
Sylvie GuinchardFaculte Des Sciences, Universite de Neuchatel, Neuchatel, Switzerland.
Dave GoulsonUniversity of Sussex School of Life Sciences, Brighton, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previously we have found that spot-on insecticides commonly applied to dogs and cats to deter ticks and fleas contaminate lining of great tit and blue tit nests via birds using fur to line their nests. Here we describe significant positive correlations between pesticide concentrations found in the nest lining fur and those in unhatched eggs and dead chicks from the same nests, indicating that these compounds transfer from contaminated nesting material into avian tissues. This study advances our understanding of how environmental contamination from domestic sources may directly impact wildlife health and development. It highlights the need for improved environmental risk assessment for veterinary products intended for use on companion animals, and more specifically the need to determine whether the exposure we identify lead to impacts on bird health in the short or long term.

Indexed as

Antiparasitic AgentsAnimalsBirdsInsecticidesOvumPesticidesAntiparasitic AgentsInsecticidesPesticidesBlue titFipronilFleaGreat titImidaclopridPesticide

Identifiers

PMID42010222
PMCPMC13156203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.