ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2026
The stability of colour-emotion associations across colour presentation modes and experimental settings.
Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Colour-emotion associations seem consistent across cultures, but the question remains whether these associations depend on actual colour perception. We examined whether colour-emotion associations are invariant to colour presentation mode (colour terms vs. colour patches) and experimental setup (laboratory vs. online). In a 2 × 2 between-subjects design, 873 Arabic speakers in Saudi Arabia associated 20 emotion concepts with 11 basic colour categories presented as terms or patches, either in controlled laboratory conditions or online. Participants self-selected focal colours online, while we used pre-selected colours in the laboratory. The most frequent association was red-love (61.5%), with distinct patterns for warm colours (associated with high arousal) and cool colours (associated with low arousal). The correlation analyses revealed remarkably similar patterns of colour-emotion associations across all four conditions (all r > .90, p < .001). While participants associated more positive emotions in the laboratory than online, no other significant differences were found for valence, arousal, or power biases between the experimental conditions. There were, however, differences for the number of associated emotions (higher online and for colour patches) and for emotion intensity (higher for colour terms), suggesting that participants exhibited somewhat different behaviours depending on the testing location and colour presentation mode. Overall, the patterns of colour-emotion associations seem largely independent of colour presentation mode and experimental setup, highlighting that these associations likely operate on an abstract representational level. Our results validate the use of both laboratory and online methodologies for studying colour-emotion associations, enabling more diverse and representative cross-cultural research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42010213What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.