ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2026
A Graph Attention Network-Based Multimodal Auxiliary Intelligent Grading Model for Uterine Prolapse Severity.
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisUterine prolapse affects women's quality of life. Traditional diagnosis relies on subjective experience with limited accuracy (ACC). Fusing multimodal data (clinical features of uterine prolapse and pelvic floor magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]) is anticipated to improve grading ACC, but existing methods generally lack effective cross-modal fusion strategies. This study hypothesizes that the proposed Multimodal Aggregation Graph Attention Network (MAGANet) achieves objective and efficient uterine prolapse grading auxiliary diagnosis via multimodal data fusion.
methodsClinical features and pelvic floor MRI data of 564 patients (March 2019 to April 2023) were retrospectively collected. MAGANet consists of modules for clinical feature data extraction, fused MRI feature extraction, sequential MRI feature extraction, graph representation construction, graph-representation fusion, and model output. It extracts deep features from structured clinical data, fused MRI, and MRI sequences to build a multimodal shared feature space and graph structure, which are fused via a Multi-level Gated Graph Attention Network for grading results. Key metrics were ACC, precision, macro-averaged F1 Score (macro-F1), kappa, area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity.
resultsOn the independent test set, MAGANet outperformed single-modal models and various fusion methods, achieving ACC 0.935, precision 0.868, macro-F1 0.908, kappa 0.803, AUC 0.980, sensitivity 0.962, and specificity 0.650.
conclusionsMAGANet effectively integrates multimodal data, yielding excellent grading performance. It provides an objective, efficient clinical diagnostic tool and new insights for multimodal intelligent diagnosis in this field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42010169What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.