ReviewZeitschrift fur Rheumatologie2026
[Modern knowledge transfer in rheumatology-From the perspective of teachers].
Review in Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rheumatology is a clinical discipline of high relevance to healthcare, yet it is often underrepresented in medical studies. The discipline combines complex immunological principles with challenging differential diagnostics and a broad spectrum of practical skills, including clinical and musculoskeletal examinations, joint ultrasound examination, invasive procedures and the interpretation of laboratory and pathology findings. As there are only a few rheumatology chairs in Germany, students have only limited contact to patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases. Teachers also face considerable didactic and structural challenges, in particular limited curriculum time and increasing economic pressure in routine clinical practice. The aim of this article is to present the current developments in rheumatology teaching and to critically evaluate conventional and innovative teaching formats. In addition to conventional teaching methods, contemporary digital and multimodal approaches, including blended learning and augmented and virtual reality, are discussed. Particular emphasis is placed on the competence-oriented approach to teaching, the integration of skills laboratories and student participation and the practical challenges of implementation. Finally, the importance of a stronger curricular anchoring of rheumatology for recruiting young colleagues and concrete recommendations for action in the teaching practice are summarized.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42010155What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.