Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42010131›Full record

ArticleNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2026

Cognitive impairment in long-COVID: frequency, trajectories and risk factors in a cohort study from Italy.

Marco Floridia, Liliana Elena Weimer, Paolo Bonfanti, Aldo Lo Forte, Viola Cogliandro, Valeria Bottaro, Paola Andreozzi, Silvia Zucco, Guido Vagheggini, Graziano Onder

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Marco FloridiaNational Center for Global Health, Istituto Superiore di Sanità (ISS), Viale Regina Elena 299, 00161, Rome, Italy. marco.floridia@iss.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3971-0141
Liliana Elena WeimerNational Center for Global Health, Istituto Superiore di Sanità (ISS), Viale Regina Elena 299, 00161, Rome, Italy.
Paolo BonfantiInfectious Diseases Unit, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, Monza, Italy.
Aldo Lo ForteDepartment of Multidimensional Medicine, Internal Medicine Unit, San Giovanni di Dio Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Viola CogliandroInfectious Diseases Unit, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, Monza, Italy.
Valeria BottaroDepartment of Multidimensional Medicine, Internal Medicine Unit, San Giovanni di Dio Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Paola AndreozziPredictive Medicine Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Endocrine-Metabolic Sciences and Infectious Diseases, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy.
Silvia ZuccoInfectious Diseases Unit, Ospedale Amedeo di Savoia, Turin, Italy.
Guido VaghegginiDepartment of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, Respiratory Failure Pathway, Azienda USL Toscana Nordovest, Pisa, Italy.
Graziano OnderFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.

Funding

Ministero della Salute I85F21003410005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundData on cognitive impairment in patients with Long-COVID remain controversial.

methodsThe study analyzed in patients followed for Long-COVID the frequency and risk factors for cognitive impairment (defined by a Montreal Cognitive Assessment [MoCA] score < 24 points), its associations with subjectively reported cognitive and psychological symptoms, and the evolution of cognitive impairment and cognitive symptoms over time.

resultsAt a mean interval of 259 days from COVID-19, the mean MoCA score recorded among 118 individuals was 25.5, with 32.2% of them showing scores < 24 points. Eighty-five patients (72.0%) presented persisting symptoms, predominantly represented by fatigue (35.6%), dyspnea (28.8%) and cognitive symptoms (24.6%). A MoCA score < 24 was significantly associated with older age, hospitalization during acute disease and female sex. Individuals with persisting cognitive symptoms had significantly lower MoCA scores compared to individuals without such symptoms, with a mean difference of 1.4 points. Anxiety and depression were not associated with lower MoCA scores. In a subsequent evaluation conducted in 66 individuals (55.9%) at an average interval of 959 days from COVID-19, the mean MoCA score decreased by 1.3 points (95%CI 0.5-2, p = 0.001), the frequency of a MoCA score < 24 increased from 25.8% to 36.4% (p = 0.090), and the prevalence of cognitive symptoms increased from 27.3% to 53.0% (p = 0.002). DISCUSSION: Cognitive impairment in Long-COVID appeared common and persisting. Cognitive symptoms, unlike psychological symptoms, were associated with lower cognitive scores and tended to accumulate during follow-up. Advanced age, severity of acute SARS-CoV-2 disease and female sex should be considered as potential risk factors.

Indexed as

Cognitive DysfunctionCOVID-19AgedCohort StudiesFemaleHumansItalyMaleMental Status and Dementia TestsMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsPost-Acute COVID-19 SyndromeRisk FactorsAnxietyBrain fogCognitive complaintsCognitive impairmentCOVID-19DepressionLong-COVIDMontreal cognitive assessmentNeuropsychologyPost-COVID syndromePsychometrics

Identifiers

PMID42010131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.