ArticleUpdates in surgery2026
Area-based centralization of pancreatic surgery: a Hub-and-Spoke system balances patient proximity and quality of care.
Article in Updates in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Area-based centralization optimizes both patient access by minimizing long-distance transfers and enables hospitals to reach adequate surgical volumes to ensure optimal outcomes. This study aimed to analyze a Hub-and-Spoke system applied to pancreatic surgery by evaluating both patient logistics and clinical outcomes. Data from a Hub-and-Spoke system for pancreatic surgery were collected over a 3-year period. The Hub center managed patient referrals from its own region and three additional Spoke hospitals. Clinical decision-making was standardized through dedicated inter-institutional multidisciplinary team meetings. Surgical outcomes and quality metrics were collected and analyzed. Patient transfer patterns related to key steps in the care pathway were retrieved and quantified. Overall, 187 patients underwent surgical exploration at the Hub center, with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma as the most common indication (56.1%). A minimally invasive approach was used in 57 (33.1%) patients. Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) rate following pancreaticoduodenectomy was 39.7%, with grade C POPF being 9.0%. The 90-day mortality for the entire cohort was 0.6%, with a failure-to-rescue rate of 2.8%. Textbook outcomes were obtained in 58.1% of cases. The median patient transfer distance from home to the Hub center was 43 kilometers (IQR 25-50), with an estimated travel time of 48 minutes. The cumulative distance required to complete the entire care process was 197 km (IQR 90-225) with an estimated travel time of less than 5 hours. The centralization of pancreatic care through a Hub-and-Spoke system ensured adequate surgical outcomes. Simultaneously, the model maintained patient proximity to care facilities, optimizing access to care pathways and enhancing patient-centered management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42010109What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.