Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42010102›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2026

Prevalence of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk-Enhancing Factors and Their Association with Primary Prevention Statin Use.

Linnea M Wilson, Jeremy B Sussman, Roger S Blumenthal, Harmony R Reynolds, Timothy S Anderson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Linnea M WilsonDivision of General Internal Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Jeremy B SussmanDivision of General Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Roger S BlumenthalCiccarone Center for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Harmony R ReynoldsCardiovascular Clinical Research Center, Department of Medicine, Leon H. Charney Division of Cardiology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Timothy S AndersonDivision of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. tsander@pitt.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-5384-275X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGuidelines on primary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) recommend considering risk enhancing factors (REFs) to inform decisions on use of lipid-lowering therapies for the 44 million Americans with borderline or intermediate estimated ASCVD risk.

objectiveTo quantify REF burden and estimate whether REFs are associated with higher likelihood of statin use.

designCross-sectional using National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey pooled 2015 to March 2020.

participantsAdults aged 40-75 without known ASCVD. MAIN MEASURES: Nine REFs were measurable in NHANES including family history of premature ASCVD, rheumatoid arthritis, metabolic syndrome, premature menopause, chronic kidney disease and biomarkers of hypercholesteremia, hypertriglyceridemia, elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and elevated C-reactive protein. Prevalence of REFs and association with statin use were calculated overall and across ASCVD treatment categories based on diabetes and 10-year ASCVD risk.  KEY

resultsIn the sample of 3,111 participants (mean age 56 years; 52.6% female) weighted to represent 115.7 million US adults, 77% had at least one REF and 28% had at least three. The most common REFs were elevated high sensitivity C-reactive protein (49.6%) metabolic syndrome (48.3%), and hypertriglyceridemia (18.9%). The presence of any REF was associated with a 2.17 (95% CI, 1.42-3.33) greater odds of statin use. Metabolic syndrome, family history of premature ASCVD, hypertriglyceridemia and hypercholesteremia were associated with greater odds of statin use (aORs ranging from 1.5 to 2.3). The presence of any REF was associated with higher likelihood of statin use in participants with low (< 5%), intermediate (7.5-19%), and high ASCVD risk (≥ 20%), but not borderline ASCVD risk (5-7.4%) or diabetes categories.

conclusionsREFs are highly prevalent and inconsistently associated with statin use. Achieving the potential benefit of individualizing ASCVD risk estimates will require clearer guidance on when and how to incorporate REFs into primary prevention prescribing decisions.

Indexed as

AtherosclerosisHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsPrimary PreventionAdultAgedCardiovascular DiseasesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHeart Disease Risk FactorsHumansMaleMetabolic SyndromeMiddle AgedNutrition SurveysPrevalenceRisk FactorsHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitorscardiovascular diseaseprevenative careprimary preventionstatins

Identifiers

PMID42010102
PMCPMC13569744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.