Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42010098›Full record

ReviewJournal of general internal medicine2026

Medical-Legal Partnership as Value-Based Primary Care: Interprofessional Teamwork for Health-Related Social Needs.

Jin K Park, Andrew F Beck, Keegan Warren, William M Sage

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of general internal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jin K ParkYale Law School, New Haven, CT, USA.
Andrew F BeckUniversity of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Keegan WarrenTexas A&M Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX, USA.
William M SageTexas A&M University School of Law and College of Medicine, Fort Worth, TX, USA. William.sage@tamu.edu.ORCID 0009-0005-9835-6236

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Today's primary care physicians are being asked to address patients' health-related social needs (HRSN) as part of their routine care practices. An aging population, with a growing complement of intersecting medical and social needs, increases this burden on primary care. Medical-legal partnerships (MLP) are interprofessional collaborations that combine clinical and legal expertise to address HRSN involving housing, public benefits, employment, and other domains remediable by civil legal assistance. A value-based approach to integrating MLP into the health system may help primary care practices more effectively address HRSN and, in turn, better balance revenue and expenses. At the practice and healthcare system levels, a key operational component is data coordination between medical and legal partners, which will enable MLP to define patient populations whose needs are amenable to legal intervention. At the state and federal levels, policy coordination will play a similar role, assessing existing authorities under Medicaid and other federal programs and advocating for data-justified enhancements. Health systems, hospitals, clinics, and primary care practices should recognize the potential for MLP to improve the value of clinical care delivery for patients with HRSN, their families, and communities.

Indexed as

Interprofessional RelationsPatient Care TeamPrimary Health CareHumansUnited StatesValue-Based Health Care

Identifiers

PMID42010098
PMCPMC13421709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.