ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2026
Environmental stewardship and robotic surgery: innovation without compromise.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Robotic surgery represents a major paradigm shift in surgical care, delivering significant improvements in precision, ergonomics, and postoperative patient outcomes. However, the rapid global proliferation of these systems necessitates a critical evaluation of their environmental sustainability. The healthcare sector, particularly within hospital operating theatres, is already a highly resource-intensive environment contributing substantially to national greenhouse gas emissions. The integration of robotic platforms may further exacerbate this ecological footprint through energy-intensive console and robotic arm operations, high consumption of single-use instruments, complex waste streams, and significant upstream manufacturing emissions. Recent life-cycle assessments indicate that robotic systems draw approximately 3.5 kW during operation, generating roughly 4 kg of CO₂ per hour. This is markedly higher than the 0.6 kW and 1 kg of CO₂ per hour associated with conventional laparoscopic equipment. This commentary piece aims to highlight these environmental realities for surgeons and key stakeholders. We do not advocate for the abandonment of robotic surgery, as its clinical benefits remain high. Rather, we issue a call for responsible environmental stewardship and innovation toward ecologically sustainable robotic platforms and components that maintain clinical excellence while mitigating planetary harm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.