Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42010060›Full record

ArticleForensic science, medicine, and pathology2026

Atypical chest contact in a domestic electrocution - an autopsy case report.

Ajay Zacaria, Pooja Gupta, Vikas Meshram, Tanuj Kanchan, Apurva Arora, Poonam Elhence

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Forensic science, medicine, and pathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ajay ZacariaDepartment of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.
Pooja GuptaDepartment of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India. pooja.gup2006@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-8175-3218
Vikas MeshramDepartment of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4917-2148
Tanuj KanchanDepartment of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0346-1075
Apurva AroraDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.
Poonam ElhenceDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electrocution deaths are uncommon and predominantly accidental with endogenous burn produced at the site of electrical contact being the most evident positive sign on autopsy in low voltage electrocutions. Atypical wound locations raise suspicion of non-accidental, i.e. suicidal or homicidal manner of occurrence and require corroboration of autopsy findings with circumstantial evidence. In this case report, we are presenting an unwitnessed fatal electrocution with a relatively large Joule burn present over the chest showing minimal thermal damage to the overlying clothing. The wound morphology corresponded to the rusted inner edge of the metallic impeller casing of an electrical water motor pump present at the scene of occurrence. The present case is being reported to highlight this atypical patterned injury and to discuss the role of histopathological examination and retrospective event reconstruction in evaluating electrocution incidents in forensic pathology practice.

Indexed as

Atypical contact woundAutopsyElectrocutionForensic PathologyHistopathology

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.