Trial reportJournal of clinical psychology in medical settings2026
The Role of Psychosocial Risk Status in Relation to Outcomes Following Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Youth with Abdominal Pain-Related Disorders of Gut-Brain Interaction.
Trial report in Journal of clinical psychology in medical settings, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
It is unknown whether youth with abdominal pain-related disorders of gut-brain interaction (AP-DGBI) and clinically elevated pain intensity, functional disability, and anxiety ("high-risk") respond differentially to the Aim to Decrease Anxiety and Pain Treatment (ADAPT), an evidence-based cognitive behavioral therapy program, compared to youth with fewer risk factors ("low-risk"). This secondary analysis included youth aged 9-14 with AP-DGBI recruited from outpatient gastroenterology clinics and randomized to receive ADAPT plus treatment as usual (TAU) or TAU-alone. Baseline risk status was determined using an established grading system derived from validated measures. Differences in post-treatment (~ 8 weeks) pain intensity, functional disability, and anxiety were examined using a multivariate analysis of covariance model with an interaction of risk-status-by-treatment-allocation. Data from 79 youth were analyzed; 29 (36.7%) were high-risk. Risk status (F(3, 72) = 3.30, Wilks' Λ = 0.879, p = 0.025) predicted higher post-treatment pain intensity (estimated marginal mean difference high versus low risk 1.47 [95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.44, 2.50]) and functional disability (5.71 [95% CI 1.38, 10.05]), but not anxiety. Accounting for risk status, ADAPT did not affect post-treatment outcomes and no risk-by-treatment-interaction emerged. Risk status predicted post-treatment outcomes for youth with AP-DGBI. Clinical implications include screening of psychosocial risk factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.