ArticleDevelopmental science2026
Making Machine Learning Accessible for Developmental Science: The Case of Automated Face Detection.
Article in Developmental science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The last decade has seen rapid advancements in machine learning, significantly transforming fields like cybersecurity and healthcare. Developmental science has been slower to adopt these technologies. Yet, machine learning holds immense potential to transform this field, enabling scalable and data-driven insights into developmental processes. Broader adoption is currently hindered by challenges in algorithm selection and technical implementation. We address these barriers by focusing on an area that has reached high sophistication from a machine learning perspective while also being of significant interest to developmental scientists: face detection. Face detection is crucial for analysing visual experiences through children's dynamic, first-person views. Automatising this process allows efficient handling of large egocentric datasets, enabling well-powered studies otherwise limited by labour-intensive manual annotation. Here, we systematically evaluated 13 state-of-the-art face detection algorithms (DeepFace library) using data from two increasingly common developmental methodologies involving children under 3 years of age: head-mounted eye-tracking in more structured settings (N = 20; n = 10 4-month-olds, n = 10 8-month-olds) and head-mounted cameras in naturalistic home environments (N = 10 18-29-month-olds). Benchmarking these algorithms against manual annotations revealed that YOLOv11Face (M) and RetinaFace consistently outperformed others in terms of precision and recall, exhibiting strong concordance with manual ratings, lower error, reduced systematic deviation and robust rank-order correlations with manual annotations. To facilitate broader adoption, we introduce an accessible face detection tool (TinyExplorer Detection App), promoting efficiency, scalability, and innovation in developmental science by widening access to machine learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.