Observational studyInternal and emergency medicine2026
Response to dual anti-impulse and lipid-lowering therapy is associated with clinical outcomes in chronic type B aortic syndrome.
Observational study in Internal and emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chronic type B aortic syndrome (cTBAS) is a rare condition characterized by persistent dissection, intramural hematoma or penetrating ulcer within the thoracic descending or thoraco-abdominal aorta. In cTBAS, pathological aortic remodeling leads to a high burden of morbidity and mortality. Guidelines recommend medical treatment with anti-impulse (AI) and lipid-lowering (LL) drugs to improve outcomes, but underlying evidence is sparse, trials are lacking, and feasibility is unknown. We performed a retrospective observational study on consecutive patients with cTBAS followed in a medical clinic from 2021 to 2025, while receiving dual AI/LL therapy with guideline-compliant targets. Response to medical therapy and occurrence of major aortic events (MAEs) were recorded. Thirty-five patients with cTBAS (23 with aortic dissection, 10 with intramural hematoma, and 2 with penetrating aortic ulcer) were followed for a median of 28 months. A MAE occurred in 11 (31%) patients. Demographic and clinical characteristics including systolic/diastolic blood pressure (SBP/DBP), heart rate and lipid levels at baseline were similar in patients who did or did not develop MAEs. During follow-up, patients without MAEs had significant reductions in SBP (P = 0.005), total and LDL cholesterol (P = 0.002, P < 0.001), and increased achievement of SBP < 130 mmHg (P = 0.046), and LDL cholesterol < 70 or < 55 mg/dL (P < 0.001, P = 0.003). All variables were statistically unchanged in patients who developed MAEs. On-target SBP at 6 months and LDL cholesterol at 12 months were associated with protection from MAEs (hazard ratio 0.19, P = 0.014, and 0.15, P = 0.004, respectively). In conclusion, results provide proof-of-concept that in cTBAS, strict dual AI/LL medical therapy is feasible and associated with favorable outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.