ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2026
Teach-Back-Centered Multidimensional Health Education in Hospitalized Patients with Multiple Myeloma: a Single-Center Prospective Controlled Study of Quality of Life and Emotional Outcomes.
Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Patients with multiple myeloma (MM) often experience psychological distress and reduced quality of life (QoL), but evidence for teach-back–based education in MM is limited. We tested a teach-back–centered multidimensional intervention in hospitalized patients. This single-center prospective controlled study enrolled 195 inpatients. The intervention group (n = 101) received teach-back–guided disease education plus psychological and lifestyle support, in addition to usual care. Controls (n = 94) received usual care alone. Outcomes included QoL (EORTC QLQ-C30), anxiety, depression, anger, disease knowledge, C-reactive protein (CRP), and immunoglobulin G (IgG). Linear mixed-effects models estimated group differences; Hedges g was reported. QoL improved in both groups, with an additional benefit in the intervention group (Time×Group β = 0.705; 95% CI 0.261–1.149; P = 0.004; Hedges g = 0.251). Anxiety, depression, and anger decreased in both groups; the intervention group showed larger reductions in anxiety (β = −0.173; 95% CI − 0.341 to − 0.006; P = 0.009; g = − 0.117), depression (β = −0.177; 95% CI − 0.352 to − 0.003; P = 0.046; g = − 0.112), and anger (β = −0.567; 95% CI − 0.732 to − 0.002; P = 0.038; g = − 0.682). Disease knowledge increased without a between-group difference (β = 0.183; P = 0.657). Exploratory analyses suggested larger reductions in CRP (β = −3.442; 95% CI − 6.296 to − 1.411; P = 0.014) and IgG (β = −0.632; 95% CI − 0.988 to − 0.276; P = 0.043). A teach-back centred multidimensional intervention improved QoL and emotional outcomes beyond usual care. The observed between-group differences in CRP and IgG were exploratory associations. Future multicentre randomised studies with longer follow-up are needed to confirm the durability and generalisability of the QoL and emotional benefits observed in this study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42009977What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.