ArticleScientific reports2026
Boomerang effects of vaccination promotion and the roles of psychological reactance, message fatigue, and social norms.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Boomerang effects in influenza vaccination campaigns can undermine immunization efforts by increasing vaccine refusal. To effectively reduce these counterproductive outcomes, practitioners should not only communicate the risks and benefits of influenza vaccination but also consider whether their communication strategies could inadvertently trigger boomerang effects. Understanding why and how these effects occur is therefore crucial. This study investigates the mechanisms and boundary conditions underlying boomerang effects in influenza vaccine communication. Specifically, we examined psychological reactance as the key mechanism, focusing on immediate threats to freedom induced by persuasive messages and message fatigue resulting from prolonged exposure. Additionally, we explored how normative perceptions act as boundary conditions. An online experiment with U.S. adults (N = 648) analyzed via multigroup structural equation modeling revealed that both perceived threat to freedom and message fatigue were significant antecedents of psychological reactance, which was associated with increased vaccine refusal. Furthermore, perceived descriptive norms amplified these associations, whereas injunctive norms did not moderate them. These findings underscore the practical importance of carefully crafting vaccination messages that minimize perceived threats and avoid overexposure while considering social norms to reduce psychological reactance and enhance vaccination uptake.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.