ArticleScientific reports2026
An empirical study on the multidimensional influencing factors of taekwondo training for middle school students in an artificial intelligence environment.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This work explores the multidimensional impacts of an Artificial Intelligence (AI) environment on Taekwondo training for middle school students. It establishes an intelligent training system and personalized training programs and compares the training outcomes of an experimental group (trained in an AI environment) with a control group (trained in a traditional environment). All participants are from the same middle school and undergo baseline assessments before the study to ensure data reliability and consistency. The results indicate that psychological state significantly and positively impacts students’ motivation levels (supporting Hypothesis 1), meaning that a good psychological state can markedly enhance middle school students’ training motivation. Additionally, motivation levels have a notable positive effect on the performance of technical movements (supporting Hypothesis 2). This illustrates that higher motivation levels can effectively improve the quality of technical movements, highlighting the importance of motivation in training outcomes. Furthermore, self-efficacy also has a significant positive influence on technical movement scores (supporting Hypothesis 3), indicating that the higher the students’ confidence in their abilities is, the better their technical performance is. The impact of training records on technical movement scores is likewise significant (supporting Hypothesis 4), where more training time and higher engagement can effectively enhance technical scores, emphasizing the importance of behavioral involvement. Finally, motivation levels also have a significant positive effect on self-efficacy (supporting Hypothesis 5), with high motivation levels contributing to an increase in students’ self-efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.