ArticleScientific reports2026
Particle peak velocity prediction based on risk-oriented hybrid ensemble learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In blasting engineering, accurate prediction of peak particle velocity (PPV) is essential to ensuring the safety of surrounding structures. In machine-learning-based PPV prediction, symmetric loss functions (e.g. MSE) are commonly adopted as optimisation objectives. However, these functions treat overestimation and underestimation equally, making them ill-suited for applications with stringent safety requirements, where hazardous underestimation must be avoided. To address this limitation, a risk-oriented hybrid ensemble model is proposed to enhance both safety and reliability while maintaining high prediction accuracy. Three gradient-boosting tree models-LightGBM, XGBoost, and CatBoost-are employed as base learners and integrated using a stacking framework. To obtain near-optimal configurations for the three base learners, Bayesian Optimisation (BO), Grey Wolf Optimiser (GWO), and Particle Swarm Optimisation (PSO) are employed for hyperparameter tuning. Building on the ensemble framework, an asymmetric safety assessment system is proposed. Model performance near the PPV safety threshold is quantified using the asymmetric weighted mean squared error (W-MSE) and the hazardous low-estimation rate (HLR). The results indicate that the integrated model achieves strong overall performance and effectively suppresses hazardous underestimation. The integrated model demonstrates clear advantages in PPV prediction. Moreover, it provides a reusable paradigm for embedding engineering safety constraints into machine learning training and evaluation, thereby offering reliable technical support for safety planning and risk minimisation in blasting projects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.