Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42009929›Full record

ReviewHeredity2026

Eugenics and the Genetics Society.

Alex Aylward, Daniel J Fairbanks, Maria Kiladi, Gregory Radick

Abstract readHistorical ArticleReview
In one paragraph

Review in Heredity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alex AylwardAlex Aylward, Faculty of History, University of Oxford, Stephen A. Schwarzman Centre for the Humanities, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Oxford, UK. alexander.aylward@history.ox.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-7551-9710
Daniel J FairbanksDaniel J. Fairbanks, Department of Biology, Utah Valley University, Orem, UT, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7422-0549
Maria KiladiMaria Kiladi, Department of Political Science, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0009-0001-4729-8006
Gregory RadickGregory Radick, School of Philosophy, Religion and History of Science, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1722-6658

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetics and eugenics co-evolved at the beginning of the twentieth century and remained associated through the 1940s and beyond. Early geneticists were far from unanimous in their views on eugenics; some avidly supported the movement, whereas others openly opposed it or chose to remain detached. Academic institutions and scientific societies are currently reckoning with their past associations with eugenics. This article highlights historical connections between the UK Genetics Society and the eugenics movement in Britain. The complexity of these connections is illustrated through case studies of three notable Genetics Society past Presidents-J. B. S. Haldane, R. A. Fisher, and L. S. Penrose-who represent diverse ways that British geneticists engaged with the eugenics movement, from career-long support to science-based opposition. Their contributions to, and critiques of, eugenics are situated in their scientific and historical contexts. We reflect on the historical role of professional genetics organisations in facilitating the rise of eugenics in the early twentieth century, and the present responsibility of the same organisations to combat its contemporary revival.

Indexed as

EugenicsGeneticsSocieties, ScientificHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHumansUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID42009929
PMCPMC13219441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.