ArticleHeredity2026
Adaptive value of marginal populations: integrating selective signals, neutral processes and temporal scales.
Article in Heredity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The importance of populations inhabiting ecologically marginal areas has been extensively debated and shown to depend largely on their adaptive value. These populations may harbour unique genetic combinations essential for long-term resilience. This study investigates the adaptive value of marginal populations through a multidimensional genomic analysis that integrates selective signals, neutral processes, and temporal scales. Using targeted exome sequencing, we searched for genomic signatures of divergent selection between environmentally marginal and core populations of the Mediterranean alpine species Silene ciliata. We also analysed genetic population structure, demographic history, and selective sweeps at different levels. Populations from core and marginal environments showed similar values of nucleotide diversity, inbreeding, and relatedness. Demographic reconstructions revealed that marginal, low-elevation populations functioned as stable historical rear-edges (refugia) during post-glacial upslope colonization, retaining high effective population sizes despite current demographic decline. We detected putative signals of diversifying selection involving 11 SNPs in nine genes and five gene pathways (e.g., RNA transport and stress-response metabolism), suggesting that local adaptation persists despite high gene flow. Our findings demonstrate that current environmental suitability is a poor predictor of genetic diversity, which is instead primarily shaped by historical stability. These results underscore the critical value of marginal populations as evolutionary reservoirs that can provide the genetic variation necessary for adaptive responses to climate change through gene flow.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.