Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42009908›Full record

SynthesisJournal of robotic surgery2026

Periprosthetic fractures associated with pin placement in robot- or navigation-assisted total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Carlos Peñaherrera-Carrillo, María Susana Cabrera-Ávila, Miguel Quintero-Quintero, Victoria Carranza Aranda, Carlos Javier Pineda Villaseñor, Carlos Suarez-Ahedo

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Carlos Peñaherrera-CarrilloAdult Hip and Knee Reconstruction, National Rehabilitation Institute of Mexico, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1474-5295
María Susana Cabrera-ÁvilaNational Rehabilitation Institute of Mexico, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-2170-0768
Miguel Quintero-QuinteroNational Rehabilitation Institute of Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-3451-4365
Victoria Carranza ArandaNational Rehabilitation Institute of Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4132-9411
Carlos Javier Pineda VillaseñorNational Rehabilitation Institute of Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0544-7461
Carlos Suarez-AhedoAdult Hip and Knee Reconstruction, National Rehabilitation Institute of Mexico, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico. drsuarezahedo@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9766-2411

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The adoption of robotic and computer navigation technologies in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has expanded rapidly, introducing new device-related complications. Among these, fractures occurring at tracker pin insertion sites have raised increasing clinical concern. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the incidence, observed associations, and clinical outcomes of periprosthetic fractures associated with pin placement in robotic- and navigation-assisted TKA. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted according to PRISMA 2020 guidelines and prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD420261325067). Studies involving adult patients undergoing primary robotic- or navigation-assisted TKA that reported periprosthetic fractures attributable to tracker pin sites were included. Extracted data encompassed study design, navigation or robotic platform, pin configuration, fracture characteristics, and clinical outcomes. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed to estimate the pooled fracture incidence and its 95% confidence interval (CI). Prespecified subgroup analyses examined the influence of pin diameter, cortical engagement, and anatomical pin location. Results: Seventeen studies encompassing 13,217 robotic- or navigation-assisted TKA procedures met the inclusion criteria. The pooled incidence of pin-related periprosthetic fracture was 0.11% (95% CI, 0.06–0.21%), with moderate heterogeneity (I² = 48%). Increased fracture risk was consistently observed with diaphyseal pin positioning and bicortical fixation compared with metaphyseal or unicortical placement. Additional observed associations included larger pin diameters (≥ 4 mm) and multiple drilling attempts. No evidence of significant publication bias was identified. In reported cases, fracture management led to successful union and satisfactory functional recovery. Conclusions: Tracker pin–associated periprosthetic fractures are uncommon but clinically meaningful complications of robotic and navigation-assisted TKA. Risk mitigation strategies may include placing metaphyseal unicortical pins, minimizing drilling attempts, and selecting smaller-diameter pins. Heightened caution is warranted in patients with compromised bone quality or elevated body mass index.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeBone NailsPeriprosthetic FracturesPostoperative ComplicationsRobotic Surgical ProceduresHumansMeta-analysisPeriprosthetic fracturePin-site fractureRobotic-assisted total knee arthroplastySystematic review

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.