ReviewActa neurochirurgica2026
History and evolution of the far-lateral approach in neurosurgery.
Review in Acta neurochirurgica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The far-lateral approach (FLA) to the foramen magnum, lower clivus, and craniovertebral junction has become a cornerstone in accessing these regions. Historically, lesions arising at the ventral craniovertebral junction posed significant surgical challenges because of limited visualization, poor exposure or considerable brainstem retraction, and high complication rates with midline posterior and anterior transoral approaches. To overcome these limitations, early pioneers proposed the FLA, which extended the lateral suboccipital exposure and enabled controlled drilling of the occipital condyle, thereby offering a more direct, tangential route to anterior brainstem lesions. This approach has undergone technical refinements such as alternative skin incisions to improve closure, consistent resection of the posterior arch of C1, posterior fossa decompression with condyle and jugular tubercle drilling in select cases for expanded access, vertebral artery transposition, and endoscope-assisted visualization. These enhancements have improved exposure while minimizing brain retraction and preserving critical neurovascular structures. The FLA has also evolved into distinct anatomical variants-most notably the transcondylar, supracondylar, and paracondylar extensions-offering dynamic exposure tailored to the pathology and anatomical nuances of the case. Quantitative anatomical studies have further supported the concept that these variants function as modular exposure corridors that can be selected according to lesion location and direction of extension. Originally developed to access vertebral artery aneurysms, the FLA has since demonstrated utility across a spectrum of pathologies, including meningiomas, chordomas, schwannomas, and complex vascular malformations. Compared with traditional midline and transoral approaches, it offers superior access to ventrolateral lesions, with low rates of postoperative instability and complications in experienced hands. Today, the FLA is considered essential in skull base and spinal neurosurgery. Ongoing advancements, such as endoscopic augmentation, neuronavigation, and patient-specific preoperative modeling, continue to refine this technique. This review outlines the anatomical and technical evolution of the FLA and highlights landmark contributions that have shaped its role in contemporary neurosurgical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.