Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42009884›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Index-based FT-IR assessment of chrysotile detectability and environmental durability in asbestos cement materials.

Gergely Zoltán Macher, Dóra Beke, András Torma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gergely Zoltán MacherDepartment of Applied Sustainability, Albert Kázmér Mosonmagyaróvár Faculty of Agricultural and Food Sciences, Széchenyi István University, Egyetem tér 1, Győr, 9026, Hungary. macher.gergely.zoltan@sze.hu.
Dóra BekeDepartment of Plant Sciences, Albert Kázmér Mosonmagyaróvár Faculty of Agricultural and Food Sciences, Széchenyi István University, Vár tér 2, Mosonmagyaróvár, 9200, Hungary.
András TormaDepartment of Applied Sustainability, Albert Kázmér Mosonmagyaróvár Faculty of Agricultural and Food Sciences, Széchenyi István University, Egyetem tér 1, Győr, 9026, Hungary.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite regulatory restrictions, asbestos cement materials remain widely employed among the population, thereby presenting significant environmental and health risks due to their chrysotile asbestos composition and vulnerability to weathering-induced deterioration. This paper explores the environmental durability of asbestos cement products and the detectability of chrysotile fibres using Fourier Transform Infrared spectroscopy, with a focus on an index-based evaluation. The analysis included both environmentally exposed and non-weathered reference samples, categorised into flat sheets, corrugated sheets, and pipes. Key performance indices were developed to assess spectrum matching accuracy, chrysotile fibre detectability, and durability under environmental stress. Results indicate that environmental exposure was associated with higher chrysotile detectability, likely due to surface degradation and increased dusting potential. These findings offer valuable insights for risk assessment and the development of improved monitoring strategies for asbestos-containing materials in various environments. The paper highlights the importance of comprehensive evaluations to understand the environmental behavior and risk profiles of asbestos cement products, which can inform appropriate management approaches for these materials in different applications and settings.

Indexed as

Asbestos cementEnvironmental durabilityEnvironmental exposureFT-IR spectroscopyIndex-based analysis

Identifiers

PMID42009884
PMCPMC13265725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.