Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42009882›Full record

ArticleJournal of epidemiology and global health2026

Development and Internal Validation of a Prognostic Model for Delayed Ambulation Recovery After Major Abdominal Surgery in Northwest Ethiopia. A Prospective Multicenter Study.

Mulualem Endeshaw Zeleke, Miteku Andualem Limenih, Meron Asmamaw Alemayehu, Samrawit Tsegaye Mekonnen

Abstract readMulticenter StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of epidemiology and global health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mulualem Endeshaw ZelekeDepartment of Anesthesia, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia. muleaman45@gmail.com.
Miteku Andualem LimenihDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.
Meron Asmamaw AlemayehuDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.
Samrawit Tsegaye MekonnenDepartment of Anesthesia and Clinical Epidemiology, Private Institution, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDelayed ambulation recovery following major abdominal surgery presents a significant prognostic challenge, contributes to increased morbidity, mortality, and prolonged hospital stay. Despite recommendations advocating early mobilization, many patients, especially in low-resource settings, experience delayed recovery, and practical risk prediction models are lacking to identify high-risk patients to implement targeted interventions and personalized care.

objectiveTo develop and internally validate a prognostic model predicting delayed ambulation recovery on postoperative day one after major abdominal surgery.

methodsA prospective follow-up study was conducted on 645 patients who underwent major abdominal surgery between April to July 2025. Data were collected by Kobo Toolbox and analyzed using R software version 4.4.3. Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression and logistic regression were used for model development. Model performance was evaluated via Receiver Operating Characteristic-Area Under the Curve (ROC-AUC), calibration plots, and Hosmer–Lemeshow tests. Internal validation was done via bootstrapping. Clinical utility was assessed by decision curve analysis, and results were presented in a nomogram.

resultsDelayed ambulation recovery was observed in 48.4% (95%CI: 44.5–52.2) of patients. The model identified ten predictors (comorbidity, pain, NG tube, drain, general anesthesia, lower abdominal surgery, fluid amount > 2000 ml, blood loss > 500 ml, surgical duration > 2 h and open surgery). The model shows strong discrimination with an AUC of 0.85 (95% CI: 0.82–0.88) and calibration (Hosmer–Lemeshow p = 0.209). Internal validation revealed AUC of 0.84, with minimal overfitting. The model yielded sensitivity of 79.4%, specificity of 82.6%, and overall accuracy of 81.2%( 95% CI: 78%, 84%). The decision curve analysis offers greater net benefit than treating all or none across a wide range of risk thresholds probabilities.

conclusionA practical prognostic model was developed using easily accessible clinical and surgical predictors and displayed in a nomogram. The model demonstrated a good predictive ability for delayed ambulation recovery after major abdominal surgery. Applying the model helps clinicians with perioperative screening and targeted management of surgical patients in this population. We recommend that other researchers to externally validate the model for transportability.

Indexed as

AbdomenEarly AmbulationEthiopiaFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisProspective StudiesRecovery of FunctionAbdominal surgeryDelayed recoveryDevelopmentPrognostic modelValidation

Identifiers

PMID42009882
PMCPMC13125323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.