ArticleEuropean radiology2026
Detection of calcified plaques: comparison between coronary CT angiography and thin-slice non-contrast CT with deep learning-aided image registration.
Article in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Agatston-2.0: A next-generation AI-based coronary calcium quantification approach to improve risk stratification among individuals with zero Agatston scores - Part I: An AI-CVD Study within the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis and Framingham Heart Study.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2026Article
- Coronary plaque quantification on energy-integrating and photon-counting detector CT: reproducibility and power modeling for mixed-platform trials.European radiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo investigate whether coronary CT angiography (CCTA) misses calcified plaques detected by thin-slice non-contrast CT (NCCT). MATERIALS AND
methodsThis study included patients from two sites in the DISCHARGE trial for whom both 0.5 mm thin-slice NCCT and CCTA were available. Plaques on CCTA were defined as missed if they showed no spatial overlap with NCCT-detected plaques after deep learning-aided co-registration. Comparisons of plaque volume, density, and local coronary luminal attenuation between plaques missed and those detected by CCTA were performed using the Mann-Whitney U-test. In addition, the presence of these plaques on standard calcium scoring CT was assessed. Interobserver agreement was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient and Bland‒Altman analysis.
resultsThis study included 45 patients (40% female, mean age 62 ± 11 years), in whom CCTA missed 37.6% of calcified plaques detected by NCCT (121/322). Missing calcified plaques on CCTA misclassified 8.9% of patients (4/45) as having no plaques. Compared with detected plaques, plaques missed by CCTA were both significantly smaller in volume (3.0 mm³ [IQR, 1.5-4.9] vs. 9.2 mm³ [IQR, 4.3-21.9], p < 0.001) and had lower density (212.7 HU [IQR, 174.5-242.4] vs. 292.7 HU [IQR, 243.2-361.3], p < 0.001). Only 44.0% of plaques (53/121) missed by CCTA were detected by standard calcium scoring CT. Interobserver analysis demonstrated excellent agreement for calcified plaque volume on CCTA (ICC = 0.91) and NCCT (ICC = 0.98).
conclusionCCTA missed more than one-third of coronary calcified plaques that are identifiable on co-registered thin-slice NCCT, which suggests an underutilized role of thin-slice NCCT in clinical practice. KEY POINTS: Question Accurate detection of all coronary plaques is crucial for risk stratification. CCTA misses calcified plaques, which are detectable by thin-slice non-contrast CT (NCCT). Findings CCTA misses over one-third of calcified plaques, nearly half of which are also missed by calcium scoring CT. NCCT detected these calcified plaques. Clinical relevance Deep learning-aided registration enables multimodal CCTA-NCCT assessment, improving detection of calcified plaques overlooked by CCTA alone and providing more accurate plaque burden quantification that may support better clinical decision-making, which should be investigated in future studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.