ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2026
Textbook outcome can be reached in the learning curve for hybrid robot-assisted esophagectomy-experience from a German high-volume center.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The learning curve of robotic esophagectomy: a systematic review with a proposed training and competency assessment framework.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Esophageal resections are associated with significant postoperative morbidity and mortality. The standard surgical approach is minimally invasive, with a high proportion of robotic resections. The aim of this study was to evaluate the learning curve (LC) in the context of establishing a structured training program. As part of the retrospective analysis, all consecutive hybrid robot-assisted Ivor-Lewis esophageal resections performed by a defined team between May 2023 and October 2025 were evaluated. The LCs for the frequency of postoperative complications Clavien-Dindo (CD) ≥ III, in particular anastomotic leakage, and the textbook outcome rate were analyzed. The LCs for these target variables were evaluated using the cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis. Between May 2023 and October 2025, a total of 71 patients underwent hybrid robot-assisted Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy. In-hospital mortality in the study population was 1.4% (1/71). Postoperatively, 29.6% (21/71) of patients experienced postoperative complications classified as grade IIIa or higher according to CD. A total of 9.9% of patients (n = 7) developed anastomotic leakage. After case no. 20 a significant reduction in anastomotic leakage rate was observed, with a leakage rate of 2% after completion of the LC. The rate of textbook outcomes in our cohort was 49% (35/71). The LC for robot-assisted esophageal resections is associated with the occurrence of postoperative complications. After 44 operations there is a reduction in complications. Total in-hospital mortality was low, demonstrating that robotic procedures can be learned safely at experienced centers while achieving textbook outcomes during the learning curve.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.