Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42009854›Full record

ReviewMedizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin2026

[Readmission to the intensive care unit : A rare phenomenon or relevant to clinical practice?]

Denise Schindele, Irmela Gnass, Marc Moritz Berger

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Denise SchindeleInstitut für Pflegewissenschaft und -praxis, Zentrum für Public Health und Versorgungsforschung, Paracelsus Medizinische Privatuniversität, Strubergasse 21, 5020, Salzburg, Österreich. denise.schindele@stud.pmu.ac.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2944-4003
Irmela GnassInstitut für Pflegewissenschaft und -praxis, Zentrum für Public Health und Versorgungsforschung, Paracelsus Medizinische Privatuniversität, Strubergasse 21, 5020, Salzburg, Österreich.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6500-5847
Marc Moritz BergerKlinik für Anästhesiologie, Intensivmedizin, Notfallmedizin und Schmerztherapie, RKH Klinikum Ludwigsburg, Ludwigsburg, Deutschland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6771-3193

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnplanned intensive care unit (ICU) readmissions are infrequent but clinically highly relevant. Despite their clinical importance, the underlying risk factors and mechanisms leading to unplanned readmissions remain insufficiently characterized.

aimThis narrative review aims to summarize the current evidence on unplanned ICU readmissions, identify associated risk factors and causes, and contextualize their relevance for mortality and resource utilization. MATERIALS AND

methodsA systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed and CINAHL. Publications in English or German published within the past 5 years were included to reflect the current state of evidence. Eligible studies investigated unplanned ICU readmissions of adult patients during the same hospital admission. Nine retrospective cohort studies were identified and narratively synthesized due to methodological heterogeneity.

resultsReported ICU readmission rates ranged from 3.6% to 9.1%. The included studies predominantly investigated patient populations treated at university-affiliated centers and acute care hospitals with interdisciplinary or specialized ICUs. ICU readmissions were consistently associated with increased hospital and ICU mortality, as well as prolonged hospital and ICU length of stay. Relevant risk factors included advanced age, functional impairment, cognitive disturbances, persistent organ dysfunction, and prolonged organ support. The most common causes of readmission were respiratory complications, followed by hemodynamic instability and infectious or neurological deterioration.

conclusionsUnplanned ICU readmissions are infrequent but clinically highly relevant. They reflect a complex interaction of patient vulnerability, disease severity, and care-related factors, and are associated with increased mortality.

Indexed as

Intensive Care UnitsPatient ReadmissionGermanyHospital MortalityHumansLength of StayRisk FactorsFrailtyLength of stayMortalityPatient dischargeQuality of health care

Identifiers

PMID42009854
PMCPMC13212383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.