Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42009840›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Advancing terrestrial laser scanning for 3D classification of Spanish moss (Tillandsia usneoides L.) using unsupervised, machine learning, and deep learning methods.

Alexander J Gaskins, Jinyi Xia, Inacio T Bueno, Carlos A Silva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. The case for an epiphyte area index.The New phytologist · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alexander J GaskinsForest Biometrics, Remote Sensing and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (Silva Lab), School of Forest, Fisheries, and Geomatics Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA. alexandergaskins@ufl.edu.
Jinyi XiaForest Biometrics, Remote Sensing and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (Silva Lab), School of Forest, Fisheries, and Geomatics Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA.
Inacio T BuenoForest Biometrics, Remote Sensing and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (Silva Lab), School of Forest, Fisheries, and Geomatics Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA.
Carlos A SilvaForest Biometrics, Remote Sensing and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (Silva Lab), School of Forest, Fisheries, and Geomatics Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA.

Funding

NASA Carbon Monitoring System 80NSSC23K1257NASA Commercial Smallsat Data Scientific Analysis 80NSSC24K0055NASA ICESat-2 80NSSC23K0941
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantifying the distribution of Spanish moss (Tillandsia usneoides L.) is challenging because it grows suspended from high tree branches, limiting manual sampling. Terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) provides a non-destructive means of capturing vegetation structure in three dimensions. However, no established methods exist for identifying Spanish moss from TLS data. We evaluated five classification methods for distinguishing Spanish moss in TLS-derived point cloud data: Graph, DBSCAN, Random Forest (RF), Kernel Point Convolution (KPConv), and PointNet++. PointNet++ achieved the highest accuracy (81%), followed by DBSCAN (70%), KPConv (61%), RF (54%), and Graph (52%). Unsupervised methods required minimal computational resources (2-3 min, 8-16 GB memory) without training. RF required 3 h for training, 8 for prediction with 1024 GB memory. Deep learning methods required substantially more: KPConv needed 60 h for training, 4 for prediction (256 GB), while PointNet++ required 48 h for training, 1 for prediction (128 GB). Agreement was lowest in the central and upper canopy due to occlusion. Surface variation, PCA1, and verticality contributed most to accurate predictions. These results demonstrate the feasibility of using TLS and advanced classification methods for non-destructive Spanish moss mapping and highlight the accurate classification ability of PointNet++ for future biomass estimation at landscape scales.

Indexed as

BryophytaBryopsidaDeep LearningImaging, Three-DimensionalUnsupervised Machine LearningClassification AlgorithmsConvolutional Neural NetworksLasersRandom ForestSpainDBSCANGraphKPConvLiDARPoint cloudPointNet++Random forest

Identifiers

PMID42009840
PMCPMC13261107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.