ArticleScientific reports2026
Mathematical modeling and artificial neural network of textile fabric reinforced foamed concrete for enhanced composite material performance.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The construction industry is increasingly seeking sustainable and cost-effective solutions to improve the properties of foamed concrete (FC). While textile fabric reinforced mortar (TRM) systems have been widely studied for external strengthening applications, this research focuses on the use of textile fabric as internal reinforcement in FC, aiming to enhance its mechanical and durability properties. This study investigates the mechanical and durability properties of textile fabric reinforced foamed concrete (TFRFC), focusing on its potential as an internal reinforcement material for enhancing the performance of FC in structural applications. Two densities of FC, 600 kg/m³ and 1200 kg/m³, were tested with three textile fabric configurations (1-layer, 2-layers, and 3-layers). The experimental program evaluated the compressive, flexural, and splitting tensile strengths, alongside durability properties such as water absorption, porosity, and drying shrinkage. The results revealed significant improvements in material properties with the inclusion of textile fabric; compressive strength increased by up to 59% for 600 kg/m³ and 28% for 1200 kg/m³ at 7 days with three layers of fabric. Additionally, water absorption decreased by 15%, and porosity was reduced by up to 11%. The drying shrinkage was notably reduced by 80–95% with three fabric layers, demonstrating the fabric’s effectiveness in mitigating shrinkage. An artificial neural network (ANN) model, developed from a dataset of 576 samples, predicted the compressive strength of TFRFC with an R² value of 0.99. This study emphasizes the viability of textile fabric as an internal reinforcement, providing a cost-effective and sustainable solution for improving the mechanical and durability properties of FC in structural applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.