ArticleScientific reports2026
Effect of biopolymer structure on uranium sorption by superabsorbent hydrogels based on CMC/guar gum.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nuclear power provides critical carbon-free energy, while sustainable uranium recycling enhances resource efficiency and reduces waste, requiring advanced selective recovery materials. Herein, superabsorbent hydrogels based on carboxymethyl-cellulose (F-CMC) and guar gum (F-GG) were synthesized via free-radical polymerization. The physicochemical properties were characterized via CHN, SEM, FTIR, TG/DTA, zeta potential, BET surface area analysis, EDX, and swelling properties. Their uranium (UO₂2⁺) sorption was evaluated in slightly acidic solutions (optimal pH0: 4.0), with F-CMC exhibiting superior capacity (269.26 mg/g, ≈1.131 mmol/g) compared to F-GG (⁓169.38 mg/g, ≈0.712 mmol/g). Sorption isotherms followed Langmuir model, reaching equilibrium in 120 min, with pseudo-first-order kinetics, indicating a combined mechanism of ion-exchange and chelation rather than simple diffusion. The SEM micrographs reveal that F-CMC exhibits surface roughening and granular deposits after sorption, whereas F-GG shows pore filling accompanied by aggregation. Thermodynamic analysis confirmed the process was spontaneous, entropy-driven, and exothermic. Regeneration using 0.25 M NaHCO₃ (or 0.2 M HCl) achieved near-complete uranium desorption and retained ≈80% efficiency over 5 cycles, demonstrating good stability and reusability. Finally, both sorbents effectively recovered U(VI) from acidic El-Sella ore leachates, with F-CMC achieving 0.807 mmol/g and F-GG achieving 0.609 mmol/g, the latter demonstrating superior selectivity in the the complex, multi-ion matrix. The EDX analysis confirmed F-CMC’s superior UO₂2⁺ sorption, dominated by K⁺/UO₂2⁺ ion-exchange and Al/U co-sorption, whereas F-GG exhibited lower capacity due to competitive Ca2⁺ interference.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.