ArticleScientific reports2026
Grapevine rootstocks are a promising strategy for phytostabilization in soils contaminated with cadmium.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Transcriptomic and Physiological Profiling Elucidates Differential Salt Stress Responses in Tolerant 'SO4' and Sensitive 'Beida' Grapevine Rootstocks.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cadmium (Cd) contamination in vineyard soils poses a significant threat to viticulture and food security, yet the physiological and molecular mechanisms governing rootstock responses remain insufficiently understood. This study investigated the impact of Cd on six grapevine rootstocks (Kanzhen 3, SO4, 3309 M, 5BB, 101–14, and Beida) to evaluate their tolerance and mitigation potential. Plants were exposed to soil Cd concentrations ranging from 0 to 20 mg kg⁻¹ for 28 days, with morphological, anatomical, and distribution parameters measured. Additionally, to elucidate the molecular basis of differential tolerance, the expression profiles of 14 major stress-responsive genes were analyzed in the contrasting genotypes ‘101–14’ (sensitive) and ‘SO4’ (tolerant) under high-stress conditions (20 mg kg⁻¹). Physiologically, increasing Cd concentrations significantly inhibited plant height, root length, and biomass across all tissues, with accumulation highest in roots. High exposure caused root structural damage and stomatal closure. Molecular analysis revealed a distinct, genotype-dependent transcriptional response; the tolerant ‘SO4’ genotype exhibited a swift, coordinated upregulation of genes essential for antioxidant defense (VvSOD, VvCAT, VvAPX), flavonoid biosynthesis (VvCHS1, VvSTS1), and detoxification (VvGST4, VvABCC1). Conversely, the sensitive ‘101–14’ genotype displayed a constrained transcriptional response with minimal induction of key defense genes. Translocation and bioconcentration factors were consistently below 1, classifying all rootstocks as “metal excluders” suitable for phytostabilization. Among the tested genotypes, ‘SO4’ and ‘3309 M’ were the most effective at limiting Cd uptake. These findings suggest that Cd toxicity is dose-dependent and that the superior tolerance of SO4 is associated with coordinated upregulation of antioxidant and detoxification genes. Consequently, selecting tolerant rootstocks represents a promising strategy for remediation, though further research under fruiting conditions is required to ensure long-term food safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.