ArticleScientific reports2026
Low-latency HRV analysis from ultra-short ECG windows using a modular deep-learning framework.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We present a universal modular deep-learning framework and demonstrate its application to low-latency, streaming-compatible heart rate variability (HRV) analysis using RMSSD as an exemplar metric. A convolutional autoencoder is first pretrained and then reused as a frozen encoder that maps raw ECG windows to a compact latent sequence. Task-specific heads, each comprising a BiLSTM adapter, a shallow Conv1D refinement, and temporal attention pooling operate on this shared representation. A discriminator head screens low-quality windows, while a regression head estimates RMSSD; a gated inference block routes outputs so RMSSD is produced only when the discriminator exceeds a threshold, replicating a robust "mask-then-estimate" pipeline in a single deployable graph. Using LUDB and PTB-XL with segmentation-assisted peak extraction for PTB-XL, plus an out-of-distribution Apple Watch subset, we enforce rigorous quality assurance to derive validity labels and RMSSD targets. Compared to two strong classical baselines (HeartPy and NeuroKit2), our discriminator improves combined-set accuracy to 92.12% (vs. 80.54% / 85.58%) with F1 of 95.43% (vs. 88.82% / 91.99%). On RMSSD estimation, the proposed model reduces combined MAE to 10.56 ms (from 45.12 ms / 27.93 ms) and sharply curtails tail errors (P95: 47.00 ms vs. 313.35 ms / 167.84 ms), indicating substantially improved robustness under pathological and noisy ECG. On a small out-of-distribution Apple Watch subset used as a sanity-check for acquisition shift, where the model attains the lowest MAE (7.57 ms vs. 13.96 ms / 9.61 ms) under a selective gating regime. The end-to-end model is compact (2.62 M parameters; 10.07 MB on disk) and real-time capable, achieving 15.0 ms mean latency at batch size 1 (66.5 windows/s) and scaling to ∼4.49k windows/s at batch size 1024 on a single consumer-grade GPU.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.