Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42009782›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Improving wildlife track classification through human-in-the-loop method and explainable AI.

Tinao Petso, Rodrigo S Jamisola, Sky Alibhai, Montiredi Lebopo, Ketshabile Peter, Molaletsa Namoshe, Wazha Mmereki, Zoe Jewell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tinao PetsoDepartment of Mechanical, Energy and Industrial Engineering, Botswana International University of Science and Technology, Private Bag 16, Palapye, Botswana. tinaopetso@gmail.com.
Rodrigo S JamisolaDepartment of Mechanical, Energy and Industrial Engineering, Botswana International University of Science and Technology, Private Bag 16, Palapye, Botswana.
Sky AlibhaiWildTrack Inc., Durham, NC, USA.
Montiredi LebopoKhama Rhino Sanctuary, P O Box 10, Serowe, Botswana.
Ketshabile PeterBotswana Defence Force, Private Bag X06, Gaborone, Botswana.
Molaletsa NamosheDepartment of Mechanical, Energy and Industrial Engineering, Botswana International University of Science and Technology, Private Bag 16, Palapye, Botswana.
Wazha MmerekiDepartment of Mechanical, Energy and Industrial Engineering, Botswana International University of Science and Technology, Private Bag 16, Palapye, Botswana.
Zoe JewellWildTrack Inc., Durham, NC, USA.

Funding

U.S. Army W911NF- 23-1-0293
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we present the integration of tracker expertise with artificial intelligence (AI) for wildlife species classification and its application to human-in-the-loop with an investigation in explainable AI. We collected images of wildlife tracks, built AI models from the track images, classified species based on the best performing model, and expert trackers evaluated the results against the AI model. The wildlife species included black rhinoceros (Diceros bicornis), blue wildebeest (Connochaetes taurinus), giraffe (Giraffa camelopardalis), and white rhinoceros (Ceratotherium simum). Two expert trackers and one non-expert tracker ranked the image quality of 3039 tracks. We then trained the AI model with different number of training images per class using different hyperparameter settings. The best-performing AI model was chosen and evaluated. Afterwards, 36 expert trackers evaluated the resulting model: one set using raw images only, and another set using raw with heatmap images. For the same hyperparameter settings with the best model performance evaluation, our method considerably increased the mean average precision@50-95 by 10.42% against a non-expert tracker. In addition, the required number of images for model training can be reduced by 25% when using inputs from a highly skilled expert tracker. The visual heatmaps provided a means in performing explainable AI by visually presenting the features of the tracks based on colours that help to guide the expert tracker evaluation.

Indexed as

Animals, WildArtificial IntelligenceClassification AlgorithmsAnimalsHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedArtificial intelligence modelsExplainable AIHuman-in-the-loopSpecies classificationWildlife tracks

Identifiers

PMID42009782
PMCPMC13265934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.