ArticleScientific reports2026
Environmental drivers of soil potentially toxic metals identified through multi-scenario machine learning in an arid region of Southeastern Iran.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Soil contamination by potentially toxic metals (PTMs) in dust-prone regions poses significant risks to public health and the environment. Accurate prediction of their spatial distribution and identification of controlling factors are essential for effective risk mitigation. This study determined the most accurate model–scenario combinations for predicting arsenic (As), cadmium (Cd), chromium (Cr), nickel (Ni), lead (Pb), and zinc (Zn) concentrations in the northwestern Jazmourian Basin, southeastern Iran. PTMs and soil properties were measured in 104 surface soil samples (0–10 cm) in the laboratory. Modeling was performed using Random Forest (RF) and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB) under five scenarios based on soil properties (SP), anthropogenic factors (AF), geo-based factors (GBF), meteorological elements (ME), and remote sensing auxiliary data (RSAD). Critical regions were identified by combining binary maps of the six PTMs, classified according to their crustal mean concentrations, where higher cumulative values indicated multi-metal contamination zones. The contribution of controlling factors was quantified using Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP). Optimal predictions for As and Cr were obtained using XGB–Scenario (I) (RSAD) and XGB–Scenario (III) (RSAD + ME + GBF) with R² values of 0.40 and 0.55, respectively. Higher R² values of 0.52, 0.34, and 0.65 were achieved for Cd, Pb, and Zn using XGB–Scenario (V) (RSAD + ME + GBF + AF + SP). RF–Scenario (V) provided the best spatial prediction for Ni (R² = 0.31). Human settlements in the central region were identified as critical zones. SHAP analysis showed that RSAD contributed most to predicting As and Zn, whereas GBF, SP, and ME were dominant for Cr, Ni, Cd, and Pb. Among predictive variables, inverted difference vegetation index (IPVI), band ratio (3/4), geological formations, slope, silt, and wind speed were key controlling factors. These findings provide valuable guidance for environmental planning and soil contamination risk reduction in dust-prone areas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.