ArticleScientific reports2026
Improving performance for multi-category anthropogenic debris detection in river environments by using a size-tailored annotation approach and data augmentation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate detection of anthropogenic riverine debris is essential for environmental monitoring and sustainable waterway management. While deep learning-based object detection methods have shown promising results in related domains, their application to riverine environments remains challenging due to the scarcity of multi-category annotated datasets and the high variability in target sizes and appearances. To address these issues, this study explores the potential of data augmentation techniques to enhance model generalization and performance. Specifically, a new multi-category dataset of floating debris is developed, incorporating size-tailored annotations to better represent objects at different scales. Building upon this dataset, the effects of MixUp augmentation on YOLOv10n, YOLOv11n, and YOLOv12n are systematically investigated across six mixing intensities (λ = 0.0 to 1.0). The experimental results reveal distinct, model-specific responses to MixUp augmentation. YOLOv12n achieved the highest overall performance (71.2% mAP) at medium MixUp augmentation intensities (λ = 0.3-0.7), with significant gains in large-object detection. YOLOv11n performed best at low-to-medium λ values, excelling in small-object detection like maturing Pomacea canaliculata (86.1% mAP at λ = 0.1), while YOLOv10n proved incompatible with MixUp augmentation, peaking without augmentation. Medium-sized objects like plastics maintained high accuracy (mAP > 95%) across settings, whereas water hyacinth remained challenging (mAP < 35.0%).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.