ArticleScientific reports2026
Deep brain reconditioning stimulation suppresses tinnitus in a rat model.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Many neurological and psychiatric disorders stem from maladaptive conditioning and resist treatment. Tinnitus, as one example, is the distressing perception of sound in the absence of an external source. One of the network systems implicated in multiple disorders is the 'salience network', associated with positive/negative reward, habit formation, motivation, valuation and mood. However, it is not known whether directly modulating the 'salience network' at its anatomical and physiological core, in the ventral striatum, more specifically the nucleus accumbens, could be beneficial. Here we show that a novel treatment approach, targeting the salience network, can reduce tinnitus perception in a rat model. We found that bilateral rewarding stimulation of the nucleus accumbens, when paired with non-tinnitus tones, was most effective. A combined approach using rewarding accumbens stimulation and dysrewarding lateral habenula stimulation - paired with non-tinnitus and tinnitus tones, respectively - also suppressed tinnitus but caused negative effects. Our results demonstrate how the rewarding stimulation can recondition brain networks to effectively remove the salience of tinnitus frequencies. We anticipate that our unique reconditioning strategy has broader therapeutic applications for other brain disorders rooted in maladaptive learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.