Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42009728›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Interpretable QSAR models for acute oral toxicity via tuned XGBoost and hybrid data sampling techniques.

Alaa M Elsayad, Medien Zeghid, Hassan Yousif Ahmed, Khaled A Elsayad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alaa M ElsayadDepartment of Electrical Engineering, College of Engineering in Wadi Alddawasir, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Wadi alddawasir, 11991, Saudi Arabia.
Medien ZeghidDepartment of Electrical Engineering, College of Engineering in Wadi Alddawasir, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Wadi alddawasir, 11991, Saudi Arabia.
Hassan Yousif AhmedDepartment of Electrical Engineering, College of Engineering in Wadi Alddawasir, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Wadi alddawasir, 11991, Saudi Arabia. h.ahmed@psau.edu.sa.
Khaled A ElsayadPharmacy Department, Cairo University Hospitals, Cairo University, Cairo, 11662, Egypt.

Funding

Deanship of Scientific Research, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University PSAU/2024/ /01/31340
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

a b s t r a c tAccurate, interpretable prediction of acute oral toxicity (LD₅₀) is challenged by severe dataset imbalance and complex structure-activity relationships. This study develops a transparent QSAR framework by integrating 2D topological and 3D conformational descriptors with hybrid SMOTE-RUS resampling to classify rat oral LD₅₀ into Very Toxic vs. Not Very Toxic. Using 8,396 compounds from NICEATM-EPA NCCT, features were refined via sequential filtering, correlation pruning, and Random Forest ranking. Among seven optimized machine learning models, XGBoost achieved superior external performance (F₁=0.62, accuracy = 0.87). The model's interpretability was ensured via Explainable AI: Permutation Feature Importance highlighted global contributors like nP and TDB01m; SHAP analysis identified local determinants such as TPSA(Tot); and surrogate decision trees distilled the logic into rule-based thresholds with high fidelity (≥ 0.88). This pipeline aligns with OECD principles, offering a regulatory-grade, explainable QSAR model that balances predictive power with mechanistic transparency for chemical safety assessment.

Indexed as

Boosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsQuantitative Structure-Activity RelationshipAdministration, OralAnimalsLethal Dose 50Rats

Identifiers

PMID42009728
PMCPMC13260893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.