ArticleScientific reports2026
Smart flying in challenging skies: How Red Kites adjust wind turbine micro- and meso-avoidance across weather and experience.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding bird avoidance behaviour at wind turbines is essential for accurate collision risk assessment. We provide one of the first empirical analyses of both micro-avoidance (avoidance of rotor-swept airspace) and meso-avoidance (avoidance of the entire turbine) in Red Kites (Milvus milvus), based on high-resolution GPS telemetry integrated with turbine operational data and simulation-based error correction. Red Kites showed consistently high avoidance rates: meso-avoidance averaged ~ 90% and micro-avoidance ~ 80%, resulting in an overall avoidance probability of ~ 98%. Avoidance varied with individual experience-birds with greater prior exposure to turbines showed lower meso-avoidance. Whether this reflects habituation and increased collision risk or improved spatial awareness remains to be investigated. Environmental conditions also modulated avoidance: higher wind speeds and increased cloud cover were associated with stronger avoidance responses. This suggests that under unfavourable weather, Red Kites adopt more cautious flight behaviour that may be associated with lower collision risk. In contrast, turbine-specific features (e.g. tower height or rotor diameter) had no significant effect. These findings indicate that Red Kites flexibly adjust their spatial behaviour in response to turbine exposure and environmental context. By refining species-specific avoidance estimates and identifying mechanisms influencing risk, our findings improve the empirical basis for collision risk assessment in Red Kites and highlight that avoidance behaviour may vary with environmental conditions and turbine experience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.