Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42009721›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Efficient quantum algorithm for the design of complex materials: quantum circuit learning.

Sota Osaki, Kazuki Hoshitani, Makoto Nakamura, Koichi Kimura, Tomoyuki Yamamoto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sota OsakiFaculty of Science and Engineering, Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan.
Kazuki HoshitaniFaculty of Science and Engineering, Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan.
Makoto NakamuraQuantum Laboratory, Fujitsu Ltd., Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan.
Koichi KimuraQuantum Laboratory, Fujitsu Ltd., Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan.
Tomoyuki YamamotoFaculty of Science and Engineering, Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan. tymmt@waseda.jp.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Validity of the quantum circuit learning (QCL) method for the prediction of physical properties of complex materials has been explored by comparing the prediction results of Vickers hardness of the high entropy alloys with those predicted by the conventional linear and nonlinear types of machine learning methods. The linear models include linear regression (LR), ridge regression (Ridge), Bayesian ridge regression (BR), and linear support vector regression (linear_SVR) for linear models, and the nonlinear models include Gaussian process regression (GBR), support vector regression with an radial basis function kernel (rbf_SVR), random forest (RF), gradient boosting decision trees (GBDT), and multilayer perceptron neural networks (MLP). Our current examinations revealed that the QCL can efficiently predict Vickers hardness of the high entropy alloys for outside applicability domains and extrapolations even with a small number of datasets, which implies that the QCL can be used for the design of new complex materials from an early stage of development with a small dataset.

Indexed as

High entropy materialsMaterials informaticsMechanical propertyQuantum circuit learning

Identifiers

PMID42009721
PMCPMC13260326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.