ArticleScientific reports2026
A novel hybrid CCD-ML approach for predicting permeability alterations in carbonate reservoir rocks during waterflooding under scale inhibitor treatment.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimization of HPAM Polymer Flooding for Enhanced Oil Recovery Through Experimental Core Flooding and Predictive Statistical Modeling.Polymers · 2026Article
- Polymer-Based Scale Inhibition and Desorption Behavior in Carbonate Reservoirs: Core Flooding Investigation and Statistical Modeling.Polymers · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Scale formation during waterflooding presents a persistent challenge to reservoir productivity, frequently resulting in significant permeability reduction. This study introduces an innovative hybrid modeling approach combining response-surface-methodology (RSM) and machine-learning (ML) techniques to predict and optimize permeability loss in carbonate reservoirs subjected to operational variables in the presence of the scale inhibitor DTPMP. A series of 45 coreflood experiments, designed using Central-Composite-Design of RSM (CCDRSM), were performed on carbonate core samples to evaluate the effects of key variables—inhibitor dosage, temperature, sulfate concentration, pore volume, and injection rate—on the permeability ratio (Kd/Ki). The synthetic formation water was rich in calcium and chloride ions, while the injection water contained variable sulfate concentrations (1000–5000 ppm) to induce controlled calcium sulfate scaling. Experimental data were used to develop an RSM-based statistical model and six ML-based models, including Linear-Regression (LR), Support-Vector-Regression (SVR), Gaussian-Process-Regression (GPR), Regression-Tree (RT), Random-Forest (RF), and LSBoost. Among the developed CCD-RSM and CCD-ML models, the CCD-MLGPR exhibited superior accuracy (R² = 0.9991; RMSE = 0.0056), positioning it as the most robust and reliable predictive tool. Sensitivity analysis further revealed that pore volume and inhibitor dosage were the most influential variables affecting Kd/Ki, with pore volume exerting a negative impact and inhibitor dosage a positive one. Furthermore, integration of the MLGPR model with Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) enabled the identification of optimal operational strategies that effectively minimized formation damage, maintaining Kd/Ki above 0.90 even under worst-case conditions. These findings demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed CCD-ML hybrid methodology as a predictive and optimization tool, offering practical insights for proactive scale control and improved reservoir performance in waterflooding applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.